https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123656
--- Comment #5 from Avinash Jayakar <avinashd at gcc dot gnu.org> --- There was a problem in the alg_sub_factor case, the operands were swapped. For alg_sub_t_m2, the order is correct.
avinashd at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Sun, 18 Jan 2026 20:42:48 -0800
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123656
--- Comment #5 from Avinash Jayakar <avinashd at gcc dot gnu.org> --- There was a problem in the alg_sub_factor case, the operands were swapped. For alg_sub_t_m2, the order is correct.