https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123782

--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I found this information hunting around.

a       Contiguous      Simply Contiguous       Yes
a(1:5)  Contiguous      Simply Contiguous       Yes
a%x     Contiguous (by chance)  Not Simply Contiguous   No

Supposedly a%x is considered strided and therefore not "Simply Contiguous". I
have not heard of this before.

Reply via email to