https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110743
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> The comment says:
> In order to make the paddings as zeroes for pattern init, We
> should add a call to __builtin_clear_padding to clear the
> paddings to zero in compatible with CLANG.
> But I wonder if in order to be somehow compatible with clang in making sure
> padding bits are always zero while other bits are pattern we really need to
> slow code down.
> Just not doing the __builtin_clear_padding would be IMHO better.
Yes, deleting adding the call to __builtin_clear_padding resolved this issue.
I am happy to do this if "being compatible with CLANG" is not necessary?
