https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122209
--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Some more context here. What _does_ work is t = 3 + 4 * t; t &= 0xFFF; t = 3 + 4 * t; t &= 0xFFF; ... ccp is able to recognize exactly what we want and optimize to return 4095; So IMHO it is a reassoc (or related) problem. I'll play around with that in the next stage 1.
