https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123245
--- Comment #7 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- It turns out there are a also bunch of places where specific parameters are referenced in the manual in the description of other things. * -Winterference-size option * -Wanalyzer-symbol-too-complex * In the list of things the analyzer has specific knowledge of * -fanalyzer-call-summaries * -finline-limit * -fipa-cp-clone * -fsanitize=kernel-hwaddress * -fharden-control-flow-redundancy * -minline-strcmp (for riscv) * -minline-strncmp (for riscv) * C++ Compiled Module Interface section I could try to move the discussion of interaction between parameters and other options from the option documentation to the parameter documentation (if it's not duplicated there already), but if there are cases where it's really useful to tell users how to control the parameter, maybe it should be aliased to a real, documented option that isn't explicitly subject to random change or removal?
