[Bug target/84490] [13/14/15/16 regression] 436.cactusADM regressed by 6-8% percent with -Ofast on Zen and Haswell, compared to gcc 7.2

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84490

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #23 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #15)
> The problem sometimes is still there, sometimes it isn't:
> 
> https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=37.100.0&plot.1=27.
> 100.0&
> 
> I wonder whether we should keep this bug opened, the benchmark seems too
> erratic.

It was noticed elsewhere that cactusADM seems to be one benchmark where
alignment matters.  Let's close this old report.  Performance is about GCC 7
levels again.