[Bug tree-optimization/124023] Rewrite expresions to reduce dependency height and unlock sinking

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124023

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2026-02-08
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That is:
(((captured)+1)&1) == 0)

Should be converted into captured!=0.

I have not looked if there is a pattern to do that or not (without the second
use of captured+1.