https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124038
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > I think this is also gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr123898.c after r16-7353 . Yeah, the change in r16-7353 keeps result in it's unpromoted form, and so the asserts fail again because in r16-7304 expects it to not be. I'm checking if a revert of r16-7304 is enough since result is now the same sign.
