https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124042
--- Comment #8 from Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Artemiy Volkov from comment #7) > I am away this week but can take a look on Monday. If > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2026-February/707518.html fixes > it, then it's probably a dup of 123786. I've just tried and yes it does fix it actually! Can we mark this PR as a dup, then?
