https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123212
--- Comment #10 from Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> --- My plan for this PR is to do this for -O0: > So how about at -O0/-Og we tell GCC to just try to convert the whole switch > into a single jump table? And if that fails GCC would fall back to the > "horrid codegen" (search tree :)). That way we avoid both being slow and > generating counter-intuitive code. But I'll wait for Stage 1. This doesn't seem like a Stage 4 material to me.
