https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124151
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Depends on| |117217
Keywords| |ice-checking
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=117217 |
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
> > Note the original testcase also ICEs without checking, let me try to reduce
> > that too.
>
> Actually on the trunk the ICE is gone without checking, that might be due to
> PR 117217 . I have an older compiler sitting around and reduce it with the
> ICE still there to see what I get.
>
> So maybe there is 2 issues with this testcase one that is fixed by PR 117217
> and one still remaining.
Yes so the good news is the reduced testcase for the -fno-checking case is PR
117217. Obvious the bad news is this still ICEs with checking.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117217
[Bug 117217] [13/14 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest when copying
struct with a union of structs with bool bitfields
