[Bug c++/124438] A "static const" class member is sometimes more const than a plain 'const'

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124438

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes.
But in this case it could in theory be optimized as the non-static const member
is private and there is no way to modify it.

BUT that is hard to prove so closing as invalid.