https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=124482
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> --- > --- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > The commit that you fingered only touches associate names with generic > function > targets. Since there are neither associate names nor generic functions in > pr106946.f90, I am rather sceptical. It was the only one in the affected revision range that seemed related. > Please, could you revert the commit on your tree to check that it really is > the > culprit? Will do, but right now my weekly builds are running, so the machines are busy.
