[Bug libstdc++/59171] pretty printers: reverse iterator off by one

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59171

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, of course.

I think we should just add a pretty printer that doesn't print anything.