https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113276
--- Comment #4 from richard.earnshaw at arm dot com --- On 27/03/2026 14:54, azoff at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113276 > > --- Comment #3 from Torbjorn SVENSSON <azoff at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Could we perhaps change > > /* { dg-do run } */ > > to > > /* { dg-do run { xfail { arm-none-eabi && { ! arm_fp_dp_ok } } } } */ > > in order to mark the test as having expectancy to fail unless there is DP HW > support? Or would this have any side effects that I'm nor aware of? Not quite, since unfortunately that test tries some different combinations of flags which we won't later add. The test isn't suitable for a 'run' target. But otherwise, in principle this looks like the right approach. R.
