https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100903
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Björn Schäpers from comment #16) > This now (with GCC 16.1) fires on comparison of std::chrono::duration. Do you mean comparing durations to each other, or when comparing the result of such a comparison to 0? The former would be surprising, the latter is not, because a warning is expected for any (x<=>y) > 0 expressions. The types of x and y aren't relevant. > Could we bump the priority? The Priority field is used only distinguishing different types of regressions, not for how important anybody thinks the bug is.
