https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125320

--- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Drea Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2)
> > Tentative patch:
> 
> That patch uses C++17 but GCC is written in C++14 at this point.

Indeed.  And is it really intended for "m" to accept all the memory load/store
insns in the extensions?

Reply via email to