https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125488

Steve Kargl <kargl at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
         Depends on|                            |114235, 116837, 125481
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2026-05-29
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Steve Kargl <kargl at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks for the bur report, Van.

I suspect that this is a duplicate or at least related to 

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114235
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116837
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125481


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114235
[Bug 114235] Object undefined in specific procedure for generic overload in
abstract type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116837
[Bug 116837] Generic type bound is not correctly resolved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125481
[Bug 125481] [generic] Wrong generic resolution between procedure pointer and
variable actuals of same TKR

Reply via email to