https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125488
Steve Kargl <kargl at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Depends on| |114235, 116837, 125481
Last reconfirmed| |2026-05-29
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Steve Kargl <kargl at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks for the bur report, Van.
I suspect that this is a duplicate or at least related to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114235
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116837
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125481
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114235
[Bug 114235] Object undefined in specific procedure for generic overload in
abstract type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116837
[Bug 116837] Generic type bound is not correctly resolved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125481
[Bug 125481] [generic] Wrong generic resolution between procedure pointer and
variable actuals of same TKR