https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125524
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2026-05-31
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from uecker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It works with
buf->ptr += 1;
so I think the increment operator is not handled correctly..
Tree has the following which should not happen.
.ACCESS_WITH_SIZE (((struct buffer *) buf)->ptr, &((struct buffer *)
buf)->len, 0B, 1)++ ;
Let's re-open the other bug because there is some real issue and confirm this
as an enhancement request for warnings (but I am not sure why this could not
just work):