https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125869
--- Comment #5 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #4) > This one is standalone and it fails too: > ... > I don't think the optimisation is valid for this variant unless > -fno-semantic-interposition is used, because an interposed get_bar could > return a pointer to some malloc'd memory that has 42? With trunk, it unconditionally calls abort; in 16, it doesn't.
