[Bug c++/125675] Low performance in modules compared with classical includes only fixed with -fno-inline -fno-inline-functions -fno-inline-small-functions -fno-default-inline

[jose.gomez.lopez at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125675

--- Comment #3 from Jose Gomez <jose.gomez.lopez at gmail dot com> ---
Using gcc 16.1.0

| Use Case | Energy consumption in 12 h (mW) | Binary size (bytes) |
|----------|---------------------------------|---------------------|
| Case 1   |               120               |       23376         |
| Case 2   |               119               |       27864         |
| Case 3   |               116               |       28212         |

So I can say the performance is as expected. With gcc 16.1.0 the problem seems
to be fixed