https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110626
--- Comment #23 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hello Christopher, I cannot tell you enough as to how useful your help has been and, I hope, will be. The regression 'massacre' was a splendid effort. Thank you Paul On Wed, 24 Jun 2026 at 17:20, albert at tugraz dot at <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110626 > > --- Comment #22 from Christopher Albert <albert at tugraz dot at> --- > (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #21) > > > I see... I was not aware that patch submissions are actively halted now > > > until this decision. This means effectively I could now block gcc > > > development by filing valid patches assisted by Claude that you will not > > > be > > > allowed to pick up so you have to invent entirely different solutions > > > (jk). > > > So until this is settled I will better stop posting. > > > > Christopher, > > > > Please do not stop posting. Jerry and I will keep a record of your patches > > and will attack the backlog as soon as we are able to. > > > > If the patches are sufficiently small and 'obvious', we might well decide to > > push them, together with testcases fully rooted in the reporter's > > testcase(s). > > > > Paul > > Fine, then see my patches as prototypes which you can use in any form you > like. > If it means typing parts of it by hand formally to avoid copying this is also > fine by me. By my sign-off I dedicate them to GCC so if you find them useful > we > figure out a way (or wait). Thank you! > > Chris > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. > You are the assignee for the bug.
