https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=125998
--- Comment #11 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #9)
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #5)
> > but am unable to construct an
> > example where transposed dimensions occur and which can be passed to
> > target, contiguous dummy which can be associated with the actual.
> I don't understand what you are looking for. The original testcase doesn't
> fit?
I thought about a user defined function which could return a pointer that
is non-contiguous and to be passed as actual to the target, contiguous dummy.
Other than TRANSPOSE.
>
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #7)
> > Another part of the issue is that gfc_expr_is_variable has:
> >
> > arg = gfc_get_noncopying_intrinsic_argument (expr);
> > if (arg)
> > {
> > gcc_assert (expr->value.function.isym->id == GFC_ISYM_TRANSPOSE);
> > return gfc_expr_is_variable (arg);
> > }
> >
> > This seems to be your code, Mikael.
> > We could try to suppress this exception.
> Heh, no, the exception is important to gfc_expr_is_variable.
>
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #7)
> > > This seems to be your code, Mikael.
> > > We could try to suppress this exception.
> >
> > Like:
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
> > index 9108e92b446..a18701763e2 100644
> > --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
> > @@ -8045,6 +8047,7 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gfc_symbol *
> > sym,
> > ? gfc_is_not_contiguous (e)
> > : !gfc_is_simply_contiguous (e, false, true))
> > && gfc_expr_is_variable (e)
> > + && gfc_get_noncopying_intrinsic_argument (e) == NULL
> > && e->rank != -1)
> > {
> > gfc_conv_subref_array_arg (&parmse, e, nodesc_arg,
> OK, like this it's acceptable.
Or:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
index 9108e92b446..6f5cc998e19 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc
@@ -8041,7 +8043,8 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gfc_symbol * sym,
INTENT_IN, fsym->attr.pointer);
}
else if (fsym && fsym->attr.contiguous
- && (fsym->attr.target
+ && ((fsym->attr.target
+ && !gfc_get_noncopying_intrinsic_argument (e))
? gfc_is_not_contiguous (e)
: !gfc_is_simply_contiguous (e, false, true))
&& gfc_expr_is_variable (e)
This would directly address the regression introduced by my patch.
> I have the impression that the problem is more in gfc_conv_subref_array_arg
> though.
But we do want a temporary here, don't we?