https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126072
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #5) > (FYI, currently there's unfortunately c++ breakage for cris-elf; hours of > broken builds followed by a regress-42, where for r17-2029-gaef738b4a47e it > was regress-4 including "yours". Sometimes other people's autotesters notice > and complain, and it gets fixed, sometimes I have to at least report it.) As closure, only because I incidentally mentioned it above: we're back at regress-4 since at least r17-2098-gac91bb5b441cd7 (with T0 some time 2007). FWIW, I may be less responsive in the coming weeks, but I think no further action is asked from me, now with the fix verified. Just waiting for the fix to be approved and committed.
