https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126244
--- Comment #3 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Christian Herber from comment #2) > I tried, but could not. This bug is rather sensible, and smaller changes > make it disappear. I will try to get a gcc 16 up and running and retry with > that. Yeah, that's unfortunately common with this class of bugs. What's the smallest source version you have (short of compiling the whole project)? We might still be able to iterate from there.
