https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126110
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Drea Pinski from comment #10) > (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #9) > > Created attachment 65041 [details] > > potential patch > > Thanks for fixing this. I would never guess this. It was pretty complex :-) Do we want to fix this in GCC 16 too? There is a minor impact in performance on GCC 17 (.4% in VRP) , but it might be more in GCC 16 where we only had the single timestamp. And thus patch will be slightly different. If you want I can check and see...
