[Bug c++/126319] -Wmissing-field-initializers with designated initializers indicates a base class even though all members are default-initialized

[jonathan.poelen at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126319

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Poelen <jonathan.poelen at gmail dot com> ---
Come to think of it, I believe the diagnosis for uninitialized members of a
base class is also incorrect. It should explicitly refer to the members in
question rather than the base class.

struct BBase
{
    int x;
};

struct B : BBase
{
  int a = 0;
  int b;
};


int main()
{
  (void)B{.b=1}; // missing initializer for member 'B::BBase'
                 // should be B::BBase::x or
}