https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126538
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > sizeof (long) doesn't look like a good idea, that would make the compilation > dependent on the host size of long, 64-bit cc1 would compile something > different from 32-bit cc1 targetting the same target. Did you mean size of > the target long (or wordsize or something similar)? Yeah, just some relevant cap for the target that will cover typical ints. Suggestions welcome :-) This never affects correctness, just gives PHIs a better range if the modifier converges during the iteration.
