https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126729
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrea Pinski <[email protected]>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbdabd5f9a27c80a19767918adaa1ee968cf4adf commit r17-3169-gfbdabd5f9a27c80a19767918adaa1ee968cf4adf Author: Andrea Pinski <[email protected]> Date: Sat Aug 8 11:03:55 2026 -0700 gimplefe: Add support for REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER on mem While fixing PR 126729 and PR 126570, I found it was hard to figure out if REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER was set on a MEM_REF. Even for the gimple fe was able to set it. This adds support to the gimple fe and also outputs REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER for MEM_REF in gimple mode. Bootstrapped and tested on x84_64-linux-gnu. gcc/c/ChangeLog: * gimple-parser.cc (c_parser_gimple_postfix_expression): Allow for an optional `, 1/0` in front of the cb pair for MEM_REF. gcc/ChangeLog: * tree-pretty-print.cc (dump_mem_ref): Dump REF_REVERSE_STORAGE_ORDER if it was set. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/gimplefe-59.c: New test. Signed-off-by: Andrea Pinski <[email protected]>
