https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111959

--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrea Pinski <[email protected]>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5af52562e3fb59bcecaa25ef834424e7f7076400

commit r17-3171-g5af52562e3fb59bcecaa25ef834424e7f7076400
Author: Andrea Pinski <[email protected]>
Date:   Thu Aug 6 20:03:46 2026 -0700

    Improve tree_expr_nonnegative_p by using the ranger [PR111959]

    When I was looking into fixing tree_expr_nonnegative_p not to be recusive,
    we should have tree_expr_nonnegative_p use the ranger.
    I also didn't realize I wrote this patch before so this is
    the updated version of the already approved:
    https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-October/634205.html
    Updated for the review comments.

    Note testsuite/g++.dg/ipa/pure-const-3.C testcase will always fail as we
can
    use the fact the argument is always non-negative in many different places
now.
    Since there is no way to test it, let's remove the testcase.

    Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.

    Changes since v1:
    * Use get_range_query instead of the global range.
    Update the wording on pr80776-1.c testcase and add new testcase without
dom.

            PR tree-optimization/111959

    gcc/ChangeLog:

            * fold-const.cc (tree_single_nonnegative_p): Use the range to see
            if the SSA_NAME was nonnegative.

    gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

            * gcc.dg/pr80776-1.c: xfail and update comment.
            * gcc.dg/pr80776-1a.c: New test.
            * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-44.c: New test.
            * g++.dg/ipa/pure-const-3.C: Remove.

    Signed-off-by: Andrea Pinski <[email protected]>
  • [Bug middle-end/111959] tree_si... cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

Reply via email to