https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126925
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed| |2026-08-18
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code,
| |missed-optimization
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed. The issue is that we analyzed cand->var_after (f_44) as being
invariant:
# f_42 = PHI <f_44(21), 6(20)>
h_24 = (short int) d_15(D);
_25 = (long unsigned int) d_15(D);
_27 = (long unsigned int) h_24;
_36 = _25 + 18446744073709551612;
_21 = _36 - _27;
_22 = _27 - _36;
_7 = f_42 + _22;
f_44 = _7 + _21;
here f_44 simplifies to f_42 meaning the f_42 PHI simplifies to '6'.
But that's not expected, the IV candidate is analyzed as
{6, +, ((long unsigned int) d_15(D) - (long unsigned int) (short int) d_15(D))
+ ((long unsigned int) (short int) d_15(D) - (long unsigned int) d_15(D)) }
which failed to simplify.
I'll fix the ICE.