https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127159
--- Comment #2 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #1) > Just a note: I'm not convinced this is something we *need* to fix. However, > it may be good to look into this and possibly figure out a way to adjust the > costing further to help GCC produce good code even in this case. Sure, let me take a look.
