https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=126000
Haochen Jiang <haochen.jiang at intel dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |haochen.jiang at intel dot com
--- Comment #5 from Haochen Jiang <haochen.jiang at intel dot com> ---
(In reply to vekumar from comment #2)
> EVEX is shorter only when the displacement D satisfies:
> * D is a multiple of the instruction's CD8 scale N, and
> * (D / N) fits in a signed byte [-128, 127], and
> * D itself does NOT fit in a signed byte (otherwise VEX already uses
> disp8).
Will it be simpler to be done in gas, not GCC?
