https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127378
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Manjunath S Matti from comment #4) > I think you missed! > return 0; Nope, it is C23, return 0; at the end of main is optional (already in C99, it is only needed in C89). > Let me have a look at this change, I will test it on cfarm121. I have a > cross compiler for s390, since the cfarm machines have been down for a week > now. I don't know whom to get in touch for these machines? Note, cfarm121 isn't best for this because it is power10, but I don't think there is power7 in cfarm (or better something pre-VSX). The reason is that one doesn't notice if some *.o objects are compiled with -mvsx or similar options but aren't needed for __float128 support. One can still reproduce the failures unless configuring --with-cpu=power8 or newer of course.
