https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127602

--- Comment #3 from Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
#262 0x00000000013174ec in gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd14031b8) at
gtype-desc.cc:3727
#263 gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd1403210) at gtype-desc.cc:3729
#264 0x00000000013174ec in gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd1403210) at
gtype-desc.cc:3727
#265 gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd1403370) at gtype-desc.cc:3729
#266 0x00000000013174ec in gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd1403370) at
gtype-desc.cc:3727
#267 gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd14033c8) at gtype-desc.cc:3729
#268 0x00000000013174ec in gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd14033c8) at
gtype-desc.cc:3727
#269 gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd1403528) at gtype-desc.cc:3729
#270 0x00000000013174ec in gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd1403528) at
gtype-desc.cc:3727
#271 gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd1403580) at gtype-desc.cc:3729
#272 0x00000000013174ec in gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd1403580) at
gtype-desc.cc:3727
#273 gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd14036e0) at gtype-desc.cc:3729
#274 0x00000000013174ec in gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd14036e0) at
gtype-desc.cc:3727
#275 gt_ggc_mx_eh_region_d (x_p=0x7fffd1403738) at gtype-desc.cc:3729


Most likely missing chain_next.

Reply via email to