https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=127752
--- Comment #6 from Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Yongqiang Tian from comment #4) > Created attachment 65771 [details] > patch Right, but we could do better of keeping around a table of if a type contains volatile or not. Reason to dot that is for scalability. Take 2 variables who's type has a volatile field down in the 1024th layer. That is a lot of work otherwise.
