https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128048
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I'd have thought this should be canonicalized as (set (reg:SI) (signextract:SI (subreg:SI (reg:HI)) ...))
[Bug target/128048] [17 Regression] arm: redundant sxth after sbfx when reading a signed bit-field
rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Tue, 27 Oct 2026 06:33:32 -0700
- [Bug target/128048] New: [1... yuki.tanaka at defaultcase dot de via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/128048] [1... pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/128048] [1... roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
- [Bug target/128048] [1... rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
