https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128292
--- Comment #6 from Drea Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Drea Pinski from comment #5) > Though I do think we have a missing optimization in the first place. The > ABS_EXPR for res_* should have been removed in the first place but currently > is not because of the NaN in x_12 which can't show up. Oh that is a pass order issue. So never mind.
