https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118935
--- Comment #39 from huangpei at loongson dot cn <huangpei at loongson dot cn> --- On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 06:58:57PM GMT, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118935 > > --- Comment #38 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to [email protected] from comment #37) > > Hi, Jerry, > > > > Is there any progress or anything I can help to close this PR? > > I submitted the finalized patch for approval and copied you to confirm this on > the hardware you have. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug. > You are on the CC list for the bug. Hi, Jerry, I test your patch based on r17-5906-g7ced41f4d43864 on loong64, here is the result: base line: 4 === libgomp Summary === 3 2 # of expected passes 17860 1 # of expected failures 285 19127 # of unsupported tests 959 ~ applying your patch: 4 === libgomp Summary === 3 2 # of expected passes 17860 1 # of expected failures 285 19127 # of unsupported tests 959 with rwlock_[1-3].f90 all passed no regression and rwlock_1.f90 passed
