------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-21 
17:12 -------
I'm going to go a step further and mark this INVALID.

Since we already do the right thing at -Os, and there's no evidence that we're
actually generating slower code at -O2, I'm not worried about this issue.  If
there's evidence that the code we're generating is slower than with a previous
compiler, post assembly code and timing information that shows that.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15559

Reply via email to