https://gcc.gnu.org/g:044d828724cb0169ee7721ae208297c2b8d5a8fd

commit r16-3627-g044d828724cb0169ee7721ae208297c2b8d5a8fd
Author: Sam James <[email protected]>
Date:   Fri Apr 18 06:21:09 2025 +0100

    doc: fix -momit-leaf-frame-pointer typo
    
    For x86, the option is -momit-leaf-frame-pointer, not 
-fomit-leaf-frame-pointer.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * doc/invoke.texi (x86 Options): Fix '-momit-leaf-frame-pointer' 
typo.

Diff:
---
 gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 7cc7bbf90020..c58695616637 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -36645,7 +36645,7 @@ The option is similar to @option{-mmemcpy-strategy=} 
except that it is to contro
 Don't keep the frame pointer in a register for leaf functions.  This
 avoids the instructions to save, set up, and restore frame pointers and
 makes an extra register available in leaf functions.  The option
-@option{-fomit-leaf-frame-pointer} removes the frame pointer for leaf 
functions,
+@option{-momit-leaf-frame-pointer} removes the frame pointer for leaf 
functions,
 which might make debugging harder.
 
 @opindex mtls-direct-seg-refs

Reply via email to