https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da46e8991709f0a175f2ed25169bab0d0f390f28

commit da46e8991709f0a175f2ed25169bab0d0f390f28
Author: Jeff Law <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon Oct 27 06:58:09 2025 -0600

    [RISC-V][PR target/64345][PR tree-optimization/80770] Improve simple bit 
extractions on RISC-V
    
    Whee.  So what got me wandering down this path was looking for a good bug 
for
    Shreya or Austin and concluding this one would be dreadful for both 🙂
    
    We're basically looking at single bit extractions where there's a bit-not
    somewhere in the sequence.
    
    A few examples for the motivating PR64345.  They were for the SH, but aren't
    handled well for RISC-V either.
    
    > unsigned int test0 (unsigned int x)
    > {
    >   return ((x >> 4) ^ 1) & 1;
    > }
    >
    > unsigned int test1 (unsigned int x)
    > {
    >   return ((x >> 4) & 1) ^ 1;
    > }
    >
    > unsigned int test2 (unsigned int x)
    > {
    >   return ~(x >> 4) & 1;
    > }
    
    Right now those generates sequences like this:
    
    >         li      a5,1
    >         srliw   a0,a0,4
    >         andn    a0,a5,a0
    
    But we can do better.  This is semantically equivalent, two bytes shorter 
and
    at least as fast.
    
    >         xori    a0,a0,16        # 8     [c=4 l=4]  *xordi3/1
    >         bexti   a0,a0,4 # 16    [c=4 l=4]  *bexti
    
    The core problem is the little white lie we have for and-not:
    
    > (define_insn_and_split "*<optab>_not_const<mode>"
    >   [(set (match_operand:X 0 "register_operand" "=r")
    >        (bitmanip_bitwise:X (not:X (match_operand:X 1 "register_operand" 
"r"))
    >               (match_operand:X 2 "const_arith_operand" "I")))
    
    There is no such insn.  andn, orn, xorn do not accept constants. But 
pretending
    we do may help generate better performing code in some cases.
    
    That pattern is a single insn from combine's standpoint.  So when we see 
this:
    
    > Trying 6 -> 10:
    >     6: r140:DI=zero_extract(r145:DI,0x1c,0x4)
    >       REG_DEAD r145:DI
    >    10: {r143:DI=~r140:DI&0x1;clobber scratch;}
    >       REG_DEAD r140:DI
    > Failed to match this instruction:
    > (parallel [
    >         (set (reg:DI 143)
    >             (zero_extract:DI (xor:DI (reg:DI 145 [ x ])
    >                     (const_int 16 [0x10]))
    >                 (const_int 1 [0x1])
    >                 (const_int 4 [0x4])))
    >         (clobber (scratch:DI))
    >     ])
    
    We can't split it because the result would be 2 insns and it was already 2
    insns from combine's standpoint (the little while lie shows up in insn 10 
which
    is really 2 instructions, but just one insn).
    
    I looked at the wacky possibility of making the problem pattern only 
available
    after reload in the hopes that late-combine could generate it, but 
late-combine
    doesn't handle scratches/clobbers like that.
    
    I consider the cases where the lie helps code generation very much on the
    margins and realized that we could turn it into a peephole2.  That way we 
don't
    regress on those marginal cases, but the problem pattern doesn't get in the 
way
    of combine's work.
    
    So that's a good first step. But not entirely sufficient to get the best
    possible code for those tests.  In particular, given equal costs this patch
    also steers towards AND which has the advantage that on an OoO core the
    constant load in that case can sometimes issue for free or it might be
    encodable directly as well.  On an in-order core it gives the scheduler more
    freedom.
    
    There's a bit of tension on that topic and some issues I'm not trying to 
tackle
    at this time.  Essentially in the sign-bit-splat path, depending on the
    constants different paths might be preferred (particularly when there's a 
NOT
    in the sequence).  It's on the margins and touched on by a different BZ.
    
    The net is we can fix the various extraction problems on RISC-V exposed by 
the
    testcases in PR64345 without regressing the minor and-not cases the
    define_insn_and_split was handling with one less define_insn_and_split in 
the
    port.  It likely improves pr80770 as well, though I haven't checked that.
    
    Bootstrapped and regression tested on both the Pioneer and BPI.  Also
    regression tested on riscv64-elf and riscv32-elf.  And since this touched
    ifcvt.cc, bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64 as well 🙂  It's also
    regression tested across all the embedded targets in my tester.
    
            PR target/64345
            PR tree-optimization/80770
    gcc/
    
            * config/riscv/bitmanip.md (<optab>_not_const<mode>): Turn into a
            peephole2 to avoid matching prior to combine.
            * ifcvt.cc (noce_try_sign_bit_splat): When costs are equal steer
            towards an AND based sequence.
    
    gcc/testsuite/
            * gcc.target/riscv/pr120553-2.c: Update expected output.
            * gcc.target/riscv/pr64345.c: New test.
            * gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-01.c: Skip when peephole2 isn't run.
            * gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-02.c: Likewise.
    
    (cherry picked from commit e0f27973e6eedf247e53d797b6ed166cba711de4)

Diff:
---
 gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md                     | 27 +++++++++++----------
 gcc/ifcvt.cc                                     |  8 +++----
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr120553-2.c      |  4 ++--
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr64345.c         | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-01.c |  2 +-
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-02.c |  2 +-
 6 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md b/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
index 59b71ed263b0..697198fcc913 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/bitmanip.md
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-;); Machine description for RISC-V Bit Manipulation operations.
+;; Machine description for RISC-V Bit Manipulation operations.
 ;; Copyright (C) 2021-2025 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 
 ;; This file is part of GCC.
@@ -237,19 +237,20 @@
   [(set_attr "type" "bitmanip")
    (set_attr "mode" "<X:MODE>")])
 
-(define_insn_and_split "*<optab>_not_const<mode>"
-  [(set (match_operand:X 0 "register_operand" "=r")
-       (bitmanip_bitwise:X (not:X (match_operand:X 1 "register_operand" "r"))
-              (match_operand:X 2 "const_arith_operand" "I")))
-  (clobber (match_scratch:X 3 "=&r"))]
+(define_peephole2
+  [(match_scratch:X 4 "r")
+   (set (match_operand:X 0 "register_operand")
+       (not:X (match_operand:X 1 "register_operand")))
+   (set (match_operand:X 2 "register_operand")
+       (bitmanip_bitwise:X (match_dup 0)
+                           (match_operand 3 "const_int_operand")))
+   (match_dup 4)]
   "(TARGET_ZBB || TARGET_ZBKB) && !TARGET_ZCB
-   && !optimize_function_for_size_p (cfun)"
-  "#"
-  "&& reload_completed"
-  [(set (match_dup 3) (match_dup 2))
-   (set (match_dup 0) (bitmanip_bitwise:X (not:X (match_dup 1)) (match_dup 
3)))]
-  ""
-  [(set_attr "type" "bitmanip")])
+   && !optimize_function_for_size_p (cfun)
+   && rtx_equal_p (operands[0], operands[2])
+   && riscv_const_insns (operands[3], false) == 1"
+  [(set (match_dup 4) (match_dup 3))
+   (set (match_dup 0) (bitmanip_bitwise:X (not:X (match_dup 1)) (match_dup 
4)))])
 
 ;; '(a >= 0) ? b : 0' is emitted branchless (from if-conversion).  Without a
 ;; bit of extra help for combine (i.e., the below split), we end up emitting
diff --git a/gcc/ifcvt.cc b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
index 2e145edc3acf..a713e66e4456 100644
--- a/gcc/ifcvt.cc
+++ b/gcc/ifcvt.cc
@@ -1291,13 +1291,13 @@ noce_try_sign_bit_splat (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
       bool speed_p = optimize_insn_for_speed_p ();
       if (exact_log2 (val_a + 1) >= 0
          && (rtx_cost (shift_right, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)
-             <= rtx_cost (and_form, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)))
+             < rtx_cost (and_form, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)))
        temp = expand_simple_binop (mode, LSHIFTRT, temp,
                                    GEN_INT (rshift_count),
                                    if_info->x, false, OPTAB_WIDEN);
       else if (exact_log2 (~val_a + 1) >= 0
               && (rtx_cost (shift_left, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)
-                  <= rtx_cost (and_form, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)))
+                  < rtx_cost (and_form, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)))
        temp = expand_simple_binop (mode, ASHIFT, temp,
                                    GEN_INT (ctz_hwi (val_a)),
                                    if_info->x, false, OPTAB_WIDEN);
@@ -1343,13 +1343,13 @@ noce_try_sign_bit_splat (struct noce_if_info *if_info)
       bool speed_p = optimize_insn_for_speed_p ();
       if (exact_log2 (val_b + 1) >= 0
          && (rtx_cost (shift_right, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)
-             <= rtx_cost (and_form, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)))
+             < rtx_cost (and_form, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)))
        temp = expand_simple_binop (mode, LSHIFTRT, temp,
                                    GEN_INT (rshift_count),
                                    if_info->x, false, OPTAB_WIDEN);
       else if (exact_log2 (~val_b + 1) >= 0
               && (rtx_cost (shift_left, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)
-                  <= rtx_cost (and_form, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)))
+                  < rtx_cost (and_form, mode, SET, 1, speed_p)))
        temp = expand_simple_binop (mode, ASHIFT, temp,
                                    GEN_INT (ctz_hwi (val_b)),
                                    if_info->x, false, OPTAB_WIDEN);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr120553-2.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr120553-2.c
index 1501f8654d9a..000f4bb687cd 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr120553-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr120553-2.c
@@ -83,8 +83,8 @@ T1(63)
 #endif
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\t(srai)" 128 { target rv64 } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\t(orn|ori|bset)" 128 { target rv64 } } 
} */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\t(orn|ori|bset)" 196 { target rv64 } } 
} */
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\t(srai)" 64 { target rv32 } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\t(orn|ori|bset)" 64 { target rv32 } } 
} */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\t(orn|ori|bset)" 66 { target rv32 } } 
} */
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr64345.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr64345.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8ca4e2411ee9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/pr64345.c
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -march=rv64gcbv_zicond -mabi=lp64d" { target rv64 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -march=rv32gcbv_zicond -mabi=ilp32" { target rv32 } } */
+
+
+
+unsigned int test0 (unsigned int x) { return ((x >> 4) ^ 1) & 1; }
+
+unsigned int test1 (unsigned int x) { return ((x >> 4) & 1) ^ 1; }
+
+unsigned int test2 (unsigned int x) { return ~(x >> 4) & 1; }
+
+unsigned int test3 (unsigned int x) { return ((~x >> 4) & 1); }
+
+unsigned int test4 (unsigned int x) { return (x >> 4) & 1; }
+
+int test5 (int vi) { return vi - (((vi >> 6) & 0x01) << 1); }
+
+int test6 (int vi) { return vi - (((vi >> 6) & 0x01) << 1) - 1; }
+
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\tbexti" 5 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\txori" 3 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\tnot" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\tsrli" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\tandi" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\tsub" 2 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\\taddi" 1 } } */
+
+
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-01.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-01.c
index f9f32227bd58..9d8a772fb8f3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-01.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-01.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-march=rv64gc_zbb -mabi=lp64" } */
-/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-g" "-Oz" "-Os" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-g" "-O1" "-Oz" "-Os" } } */
 
 int foo1(int rs1)
 {
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-02.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-02.c
index 112c0fa968eb..430d9984c4b3 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-02.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/zbb-andn-orn-02.c
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-options "-march=rv32gc_zbb -mabi=ilp32" } */
-/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-g" "-Oz" "-Os" } } */
+/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-O0" "-g" "-O1" "-Oz" "-Os" } } */
 
 int foo1(int rs1)
 {

Reply via email to