yes
On 03/20/2011 08:44 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:42:26AM -0400, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
i think that this is the right way to go. my view is not just
what the code currently does, but also from the perspective of the
way i want this to work as the back ends evolve.
Here is the updated patch, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux. Ok for trunk?
2011-03-20 Jakub Jelinek<ja...@redhat.com>
PR rtl-optimization/48156
* df-core.c (df_get_bb_dirty): Use df_lr if df_live is NULL,
assume df and df_lr are not NULL.
* gcc.dg/pr48156.c: New test.
--- gcc/df-core.c.jj 2010-12-14 08:11:39.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/df-core.c 2011-03-19 16:09:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -1400,10 +1400,9 @@ df_mark_solutions_dirty (void)
bool
df_get_bb_dirty (basic_block bb)
{
- if (df&& df_live)
- return bitmap_bit_p (df_live->out_of_date_transfer_functions, bb->index);
- else
- return false;
+ return bitmap_bit_p ((df_live
+ ? df_live : df_lr)->out_of_date_transfer_functions,
+ bb->index);
}
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48156.c.jj 2011-03-18 14:57:34.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr48156.c 2011-03-18 14:57:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+/* PR rtl-optimization/48156 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fcrossjumping --param min-crossjump-insns=1" } */
+
+extern void abort (void);
+
+static int __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone))
+equals (int s1, int s2)
+{
+ return s1 == s2;
+}
+
+static int __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone))
+bar (void)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
+static void __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone))
+baz (int f, int j)
+{
+ if (f != 4 || j != 2)
+ abort ();
+}
+
+void
+foo (int x)
+{
+ int i = 0, j = bar ();
+
+ if (x == 1)
+ i = 2;
+
+ if (j&& equals (i, j))
+ baz (8, i);
+ else
+ baz (4, i);
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+ foo (1);
+ return 0;
+}
Jakub
