> Well, such stricter checking wouldn't be completely painless, e.g. currently > both current baseline_symbols.txt and the ones I've posted don't include the > two TLS: lines, because of the fear that not everyone has TLS enabled. > If baseline_symbols.txt right now miss some symbols, it is not a big deal > if it is not in the base version (with my patch base versions), but with > stricter checking it would complain. Either we'd just say that TLS is > assumed on these targets and add the TLS: lines, or we'd need to invent > some symbol conditionalizing or something.
Ah, yes. We will keep on doing the present solution for libstdc++.so.6 and invent something clever later. -benjamin
