Hello, * Rainer Orth wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 06:12:31PM CEST: > Ian Lance Taylor <i...@google.com> writes: > > Argh, no, I am trying to fight against that as long as possible. We > > should be moving away from DejaGNU, not toward it. > > Do you have a decent alternative? I've no idea what happened to QMTest > which CodeSourcery tried for the C++ testsuite.
FWIW, Automake's parallel-tests driver at least provides halfway decent test results summary; timeouts and remote control would need to be implemented by means of a per-test driver script or program though. And of course the summary style is different from the dejagnu one ... I'm not advocating anything here, but bringing up the topic only because there's a Google Summer of Code project proposal to add subunit/TAP test protocol support to Automake[1], and if that makes it a more viable target for GCC, or if there are things missing that we should maybe lookout for and try to cater to, then I'm very interested in details early, while the proposal is still in the planning stage. Thanks, Ralf [1] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/slattarini/1
