-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/02/11 01:56, Richard Guenther wrote:
> But well, I guess the thing I don't like about the standard is that it makes > people that have started to be somewhat aware about threading issues > _less_ aware of them by providing some "false" safety to them. It > really smells like a standard designed for a very high-level language > where people don't have to think instead of a standard suitable for a > C family language. I agree it's unfortunate, but there's a general trend of finding ways to get more out of less experienced programmers. One of the ways to do that is to simplify the problem space these guys have to look at. For better or worse, it's a trend I see continuing indefinitely. Obviously we're starting to get off-topic.. jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmgiBAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7OWIH/3pLUy3CpZ/tONDfonXuJOl8 aEotqjL6nmgyweg9poJlYy9MA0kNmCq25oj+TDE1H7w2kDVMAEeJtSxo37VPYS4+ KJtxD6l+J4KNhUbsSxE1oanI1f62Mf/1TZKziKW1AkDI7Ziszz5wwvD6jTU7QiJn XaLm4gHvYtiwVBC5gPjVm0pqh8UZYpEiAdba9Y9WBSHUriLD0DfBcIwDbU59dlz0 1coYKJiXH5NlKUngFfR+oyO3pvGTgtJKweBcaQQCuV97nLsaOKiMRvVMQDA34afO etua7nfBxM0JAeWu9ttNEjskFZi+ZG3oe8xtmj3IY5OhY1bzI0ARrbtu26K0/Ts= =mOsV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
