Hi,
I've committed the following patch under the obvious rule for the
testcase for PR43920. There seemed to have been an accidental
duplication of the function in the patch committed.
Tested in a cross compiler to arm-linux-gnueabi with just that test to
armv7-a and made sure that it passes.
cheers
Ramana
2011-04-06 Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org>
* gcc.target/arm/pr43920-1.c: Fix accidental duplication.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-1.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-1.c (revision 172030)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr43920-1.c (working copy)
@@ -19,24 +19,3 @@
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\torr" 0 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tit\t" 0 } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\tbeq" } } */
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-mthumb -Os" } */
-/* { dg-require-effective-target arm_thumb2_ok } */
-
-int
-f (int start, int end, int *start_)
-{
- if (start == -1 || end == -1)
- return -1;
-
- if (end - start)
- return -1;
-
- *start_ = start;
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\torr" 0 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\tit\t" 0 } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-assembler "\tbeq" } } */
