> Hi, > > since r172430 lto bootstrap is broken, as well as the attached testcase > (pr48622) and cpu2006 compilation (pr48645). The inline summary writer > used a different order for size and time than the reader expected. > > I've committed the below patch as obvious (r172603) after verifying that > lto bootstrap passes the place of the ICE (and that the testcase is > fixed).
Oops, thanks! I wonder why this did not wreck the LTO benchmark results though ;) Honza
