On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 25 April 2011 20:06, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> could we use enums instead? >>> No reason not to, except that we don't for the cp_cv_quals above. :) I >>> followed >>> the same approach. >> Sure, let's use enums for the named values. But I think we still want to >> use the int typedef for variables and parameters. > > Would you like me to convert the cp_cv_quals values to enums in the same go?
when you do, could you test a bootstrap with a C++ compiler? (Just to make sure that no implicit conversion int -> enum slips in.
