On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 05/02/11 15:18, Richard Guenther wrote: > >> >>> For (edge *)xmalloc (sizeof (edge) * 1) use XNEWVEC and friends. > Yup. Good catch. Will fix. Old habits die hard. > >>> I wonder if it makes sense to use a VEC instead (will the vector >>> be of variable size?). Maybe wrap accesses to e->aux with >>> a macro or some inline functions. > It's fixed size (2 edges once I add support for copying the joiner block). > > Wrappers are probably a good idea as well. > > I've got no opinion on using a VEC if folks chime in with the request, > I'll make that change.
If it's fixed size there's no need for a VEC, it would be just overhead. Richard. > jeff > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNvyNeAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7SBkIAI3xXdlmEgfjD/Jd/48h63Oa > CF+qfjm3hQYLBr31UzQB82CdWgm2i7p9WLWdlMsNwnB4sEjriTE1bqnYKK6xQfnP > xlP1cUHmBij3s7IbezGN1OeL5d3lDJ8tLH3gumroutgPgktQMNMLUU7wQbf9AdlY > q1n9MVurPgCvU4K0/neX+u16r4Uo5nMx+OuKUiizR1aOI1GweykQxa9zABZ3ivnz > Yfof9jfZFappwvqRl4cAeCW1YFbXg2XdfxmVET4Bb5XvNhyLB94cTVfqIVrM1DWX > j2+UsDkexDtUyA0jxzF6+xK8vdHPcou23R8AHjSqbOvzzUUmtuKnhKYmKptLgu0= > =Ib0z > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
